Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Housing officers 'should report illegal immigrants': Judges rule that councils can examine status of foreign applicants

Wednesday 07 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LOCAL housing authorities which are satisfied that immigrants applying for accommodation are in the country illegally should report this view to the immigration authorities, the Court of Appeal said yesterday.

Three judges made the declaration when they ruled that the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, which has a large immigrant population, was entitled to investigate the status of foreign applicants and refuse to house those entering by deceit as homeless persons.

The Master of the Rolls, Sir Thomas Bingham, sitting with Lords Justices Stuart-Smith and Waite, allowed the council's appeal against a High Court ruling that only the Home Secretary could decide the immigration status of home seekers.

Tower Hamlets said it faced a dilemma because of the large number of Bangladeshi men, settled in this country for some time, who have brought in their families and then claimed a right to housing because of overcrowded conditions.

Normally, leave to enter Britain is only given to people who say they have accommodation available to them in this country and will not rely on public funds, including housing.

Cases of alleged deceit have come to light when passports have been produced to housing officials containing a stamp signifying that the holders have stated they will not have recourse to public funds.

Lord Justice Stuart-Smith ruled that current guidance from the Department of the Environment on housing homeless families was 'misleading and wrong in law' when it stated that everyone admitted to the country 'is entitled to equal treatment under the law' and that 'authorities should remember to treat as confidential information received on an applicant's immigration status'.

This did not apply to illegal entrants, the judge said.

The Master of the Rolls agreed and said: 'It would be an affront to common sense if those who steal into the country by subterfuge were then housed at public expense.'

Judith Beale, for the Department of the Environment, was refused leave to appeal against yesterday's decison to the House of Lords. She told the judges their ruling would affect housing authorities all over the country 'and could also have an affect on race relations'.

But the Master of the Rolls, while agreeing it was a 'significant and important' case, said it should be left to the Law Lords to decide whether they wanted to hear an appeal.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in