Rwanda Bill wrangling continues as peers inflict fresh Government defeat
The Lords’ insistence on changing the contentious legislation ensures a third round of parliamentary ‘ping-pong’.
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Defiant peers have maintained their stand-off over Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s controversial Rwanda deportation plan, inflicting a fresh defeat.
Despite MPs overturning previous changes, the House of Lords pressed a demand by 258 votes to 233, majority 25, that the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill has “due regard” for international and key domestic laws, including human rights and modern slavery legislation.
The latest Government setback means a continuation of the wrangling at Westminster over the proposed law that aims to clear the way to send asylum seekers who cross the Channel in small boats on a one-way flight to Kigali.
The Prime Minister’s message to parliamentarians across both Houses hasn’t changed. We need to act to save lives and that’s what this Bill will help us to do
However, the margin of defeat was down on previous votes as the Tory administration drafted in rarely seen peers to bolster its numbers.
The Bill and a treaty with Rwanda are intended to prevent further legal challenges to the stalled asylum scheme after the Supreme Court ruled the plan was unlawful.
As well as compelling judges to regard the east African country as safe, it would also give ministers the power to ignore emergency injunctions.
The Lords’ insistence on the amendment ensures a third round of “ping-pong” over the Bill, where legislation is batted between the two Houses until agreement is reached.
Ahead of the next election, Mr Sunak has made “stopping the boats” a key pledge of his leadership.
Earlier, a Number 10 spokeswoman said: “We remain focused on getting the Bill passed as soon as possible so we can get flights off the ground and break the business model of the criminal gangs.”
She added: “The Prime Minister’s message to parliamentarians across both Houses hasn’t changed.
“We need to act to save lives and that’s what this Bill will help us to do.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.