Disabled peer condemns lack of help and says he ‘might as well have been dead’
Lord Shinkwin says the pain of his operation was compounded by his ‘appalling’ treatment in the House of Lords.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A disabled peer has said he “might as well have been dead” as he lambasted the lack of support he received from the House of Lords after undergoing major surgery.
In a strongly-worded broadside, Lord Shinkwin said the pain of his leg operation had been compounded at his “appalling” treatment by the upper chamber and stressed the need for change.
His experience reminded him the House “remains a place whose rules and modus operandi were designed by and for rich, non-disabled men”.
Most members do not receive a salary for their parliamentary duties but are eligible to receive a flat rate daily allowance of up to £323, plus travel expenses.
However, the payment is dependent on attendance.
Speaking at report stage of the Health and Care Bill, Lord Shinkwin hailed the care he had received from hospital staff.
He said: “I have had half my leg rebuilt and am now the proud, if involuntary, owner of a Meccano set inserted by my excellent surgeons.”
But he added: “Although the pain was excruciating and the morphine, which I am weaning myself off, very welcome, it saddens me to say that that pain was compounded by the way in which I received no support from the House. I might as well have been dead.
“It reminded me that this wonderful institution remains a place whose rules and modus operandi were designed by and for rich, non-disabled men.
“I will say no more on the matter now, but it is clear to me that this needs to change if we are to become a stronger, more diverse, more representative House.
“If we do not want to be consigned to the past, we must stop living in the past.
“The appalling way we treat members whose disability enforces temporary absence from the House is indefensible and cannot continue.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.