Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hospital defends ram scans

Judy Jones,Health Services Correspondent
Monday 23 August 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A HOSPITAL that hired out scanning equipment for use on sheep denied yesterday that farm animals were jumping the queue for National Health Service treatment.

The Heartlands Hospital in Birmingham confirmed that its mobile computed tomography (CT) scanner, used to test for cancer and blood disorders, was leased earlier this month to the Meat and Livestock Commission to screen 20 rams for breeding potential.

The machine is normally used only four days a week by NHS hospitals, since most now have their own scanners.

The commission hired the machine as part of a research project being carried out jointly with the Scottish Agricultural College in Edinburgh. Scientists believe information gleaned on fat and muscle content may be more reliable than a simple visual check.

Robert Naylor, chief executive of the Heartlands Hospital, serving east Birmingham, said the scanner was eight years old, and that most hospitals now had more up-to-date models. 'We see no reason why the scanner should not be used again by animals provided it doesn't jeopardise patient care . . . We charge around pounds 1,000 a day. It is generating income for the NHS.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in