Subpostmaster issues ‘see you in court’ promise as wife dies after bankruptcy
Veronica Maye’s death was announced to the Horizon IT inquiry on Wednesday.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A subpostmaster who was “bankrupted by the actions of the Post Office” has told the Horizon IT inquiry he will see any prosecuted parties in court following the death of his wife.
The inquiry’s chairman, Sir Wyn Williams, announced the death of Veronica Maye on Wednesday – with her husband issuing a statement saying he believed the Post Office was “trying to kick the can down the road until we are all dead.”
Mrs Maye developed angina as the couple lost their home and were made bankrupt in October 2012 after they tried to repay alleged shortfalls and make good balances on the Horizon system.
The inquiry heard Mrs Maye’s 73-year-old husband, Francis Maye, had received an interim compensation payment just before Christmas, but his trustee in bankruptcy took “a lot of that award”.
If any of the leaders of the Post Office are taken to court, I will be at the court
Between 2000 and 2014, more than 700 subpostmasters and subpostmistresses (SPMs) were prosecuted based on information from the accounting system, which saw workers wrongly accused of theft, fraud and false accounting.
However, in December 2019, a High Court judge ruled that the system contained a number of “bugs, errors and defects” and there was a “material risk” that shortfalls in Post Office branch accounts were in fact caused by it.
Since then many SPMs have had criminal convictions overturned.
Following the death of his wife, Mr Maye issued a statement through Sam Stein KC, who represents 153 victims in the scandal, in which he said he wanted senior people at the Post Office and developer Fujitsu would be “held to account and taken to court”.
Veronica's health was affected by the financial state that was left for her and her husband to deal with after they were made bankrupt by the actions of the Post Office
Mr Maye was a SPM at the Bidford-upon-Avon Post Office in Warwickshire from 2001 until 2010.
Speaking about the death of Mrs Maye before making his phase three closing speech, Mr Stein said: “Veronica’s health was affected by the financial state that was left for her and her husband to deal with after they were made bankrupt by the actions of the Post Office.
“Francis says when they lost their home as a result of the Post Office’s actions, Veronica worked multiple jobs to maintain them.
“He found it extremely difficult to get any work anywhere because the Post Office wouldn’t give him a reference.”
Reading extracts of Mr Maye’s statement following his wife’s death, Mr Stein continued: “He’s not in good health but he would like to be able to live as comfortably as possible in his final years.
“He says ‘I’d like the senior people at the Post Office and Fujitsu to be held to account and taken to court. They knew the system was wrong’.
“He knows that he and other litigants and core participants are in good hands with this inquiry, but he feels the Post Office is trying to ‘kick the can down the road until we are all dead’.
“The deadline for compensation of August 2024 is plain wrong’, he says.
“He believes that the Post Office should not be able to set that date.
“Everything is always dictated by the Post Office, that’s the way he feels.
“‘If any of the leaders of the Post Office are taken to court, I will be at the court’, he says.
“He hopes that doesn’t sound vicious, but he hopes that the little man will win out in the end.”
Phase four of the inquiry, which will look into the prosecutions of SPMs, is set to begin on June 6.