Lack of ‘meaningful sanctions’ over Hong Kong sent ‘wrong message’ to China
Failing to sanction officials over Hong Kong’s National Security Law let China believe it had ‘got away with it’, an Australian politician said.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Failure to impose “meaningful sanctions” on China over Hong Kong has led Beijing to believe it has “got away” with breaking its word, an Australian politician has said.
During a visit to London, Australian Senator James Paterson told a think tank event that the UK and the West had not taken strong enough action following the imposition of a restrictive National Security Law in Hong Kong.
Following the imposition of the new law, the UK Government described it as a “clear and serious violation” of the 1984 Joint Declaration on Hong Kong between the UK and China and offered a new visa route for British Nationals (Overseas) and their families.
However, the Government stopped short of imposing sanctions on key figures including Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam.
Sen Paterson, who chairs the Australian parliament’s intelligence and security committee, said: “The Chinese government would look at that experience and think that we got away with it.”
While acknowledging there had been “reputational harm” for China and the issue had had an “electrifying effect” on the debate in the UK, Sen Paterson said there had been “no meaningful sanctions and no meaningful action”.
He said: “If we keep doing that, I think as Georgia and Ukraine and Crimea show, dictators and authoritarians will think that they can keep going.
“It’s actually a dangerous thing for us to do to send them this signal that we don’t care and we’re not going to take action, because one day we will care, as we’ve demonstrated in this current Ukraine crisis, and we could find ourselves very quickly in a conflict that none of us sought or foresaw and that would be a very ugly thing indeed.”
Asked if it was now too late for sanctions over Hong Kong, the senator said it was “never too late”.
Asked in June 2021 whether Carrie Lam would be sanctioned, Foreign Office minister Nigel Adams said: “We do not speculate who may be designated under the UK’s sanctions regime in the future, but sanctions are just one tool in our arsenal.
“The UK has already taken a number of actions in response to developments in Hong Kong. These include introducing a new bespoke immigration path for British Nationals (Overseas) (BNOs), suspending our extradition treaty with Hong Kong indefinitely, and extending our arms embargo on mainland China to Hong Kong.
“We will continue to stand up for the people of Hong Kong as befits our historic commitment to them, to call out the violation of their rights and freedoms.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.