Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Property magnate Vincent Tchenguiz today said it was a "huge relief" that he is no longer being treated as a suspect in a fraud investigation into a failed Icelandic bank.
Mr Tchenguiz was arrested and questioned in March last year in a raid on his London headquarters as part of a Serious Fraud Office (SFO) inquiry into the collapse of Kaupthing bank, one of three Icelandic banks to collapse during the 2008 credit crunch.
But the SFO confirmed Mr Tchenguiz had been informed by its new director David Green that he is no longer a suspect and his bail will be cancelled. However, his younger brother Robert, who was arrested at the same time, is still a suspect.
Mr Tchenguiz, 55, said: "It is a huge relief that, under the new director of the SFO, this shadow has now been lifted and I can get on with rebuilding my life and my business interests.
"The damage, however, has still to be accounted for."
The Tchenguiz brothers last month challenged the lawfulness of the SFO's decisions at a judicial review hearing in London, accusing the financial crime fighter of "institutional failure".
Both Tchenguiz brothers denied any wrongdoing following their arrest 15 months ago.
Lord Goldsmith QC, representing Vincent Tchenguiz, told judges Sir John Thomas and Mr Justice Silber last month that the SFO made "false" and "misconceived" allegations.
In written submissions, Lord Goldsmith, a former attorney general, said: "A failure on the part of an investigating authority to pick up on every detail during the course of a major investigation is not necessarily evidence of negligence or dereliction of duty.
"But the nature and extent of the SFO's admitted errors in the present case are of a different order. In Vincent Tchenguiz's submission they point to collective institutional failure."
The brothers have argued that the investigation jeopardised their relationships with lenders and inflicted huge losses on them.
Mr Tchenguiz today added: "I have consistently explained to the SFO that they had got it completely wrong - but, as their investigation collapsed around their ears, they stubbornly maintained that they regarded me as a suspect.
"The damage to my reputation and the business has been massive."
At the start of the judicial review in May, the SFO said new director Mr Green was reconsidering evidence relating to Vincent Tchenguiz's status as a suspect in light of material filed in response to evidence.
The SFO announced an investigation into suspected fraud in December 2009 surrounding UK investment at Kaupthing, which it said at the time would "seek to identify whether misrepresentations or false representations were communicated by the bank in the push to attract UK investors".
Kaupthing had a significant operation in the UK and its collapse left a string of creditors owed money, with many local authorities and charities among those that lost money.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments