Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Vet made records of fake pets to scam insurers out of thousands

Donal Johnston admitted all the charges against him and will be sanctioned at a later hearing

Matt Mathers
Tuesday 29 November 2022 16:34 GMT
Comments
File photo: Northern Ireland vet created fake accounts for cats and dogs in fraud scheme
File photo: Northern Ireland vet created fake accounts for cats and dogs in fraud scheme (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

A vet who created accounts for fake pets as part of an insurance scam has been found guilty of dishonest conduct at a misconduct hearing.

Donal Johnston created “entirely fictitious” accounts for cats and dogs at the surgery where he worked in Northern Ireland,

At the hearing, he admitted the charges of dishonest conduct and fraud through false insurance claims.

Mr Johnston invented accounts for dogs named Bruce and Sophie, which didn’t exist. He also arranged for insurance money to be paid into a bank account he owned when he set up insurance for a receptionist’s cat and dog, Angelo and Bruce.

The practice manager at Banbridge Vet Pets, where Mr Johnston worked, uncovered his fraud. When confronted, Mr Johnston said: "You’re probably talking about the insurance claims?"

Mr Johnston had worked for the vets, in County Down, for two years before he was fired upon his fraud coming to light.

The hearing was told he created three different sets of “sophisticated” fake clinical records for Sophie the dog, who didn’t exist.

Between October 2013 and April 2019, he claimed a total of £7,073 from insurers and even forged the signature of another vet at the practice. Records for Bruce, the fake dog, were created in April 2019, and Mr Johnston claimed £5,370 for his treatment and forged a colleague’s signature on all of these.

In March 2019, Jacqueline McMillan, a receptionist at the practice, brought her domestic longhair cat, Angelo, to Mr Johnston because he had been feeling lethargic and had vomited.

She asked Mr Johnston to treat him and left him to make an insurance claim on her behalf.

Ms McMillan also brought her dog, Boss, in for treatment and again let Mr Johnston do her insurance claim, the hearing was told.

This came to a total of £770, but he told the insurers to send the money to a separate account he had set up called Banbridge Better Pets.

On April 29, 2019, two partners at the practice noticed Mr Johnston had records for his pets, but they were confused as they weren’t aware he had any.

The hearing was told they cross-referenced the records and found no mention of his dogs ever being seen at the practice.

They then asked the female vet whose signature appeared about it, and she confirmed this wasn’t her signature, it had been forged, and she hadn’t treated the pets.

Mr Johnston’s bosses then confronted him about the “unusual” accounts and asked if he wanted to tell them anything.

He replied: "You’re probably talking about the insurance claims?"

They told the hearing he “looked embarrassed” and admitted making the false claims.

He was then fired from the practice and reported for dishonest conduct and fraud, amounting to £13,214.

Mr Johnston admitted all charges, telling the hearing: "My conduct was a serious deviation from the principles of honesty and integrity.

“I accept that I was in breach of client confidentiality and trust as I failed to certify facts honestly and with due care."

The hearing said: "The conduct was repeated, sophisticated and premeditated…it resulted in significant financial gain.

“His conduct jeopardised the position and reputation of his colleagues and undermined public trust in the profession.

"A member of the public would be rightly appalled to learn that a veterinary surgeon had abused his position by creating false records and submitting false claims in this way.

"The scheme he devised, which enabled him to advance these fraudulent claims, necessitated careful preparation and the creation of a series of false documents."

On 1 November Mr Johnston’s sanction was postponed for two years.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in