Universal credit: Government faces High Court action over benefit system after judge orders judicial review
Court to consider whether removal of certain disability benefits under new system has left severely disabled in serious financial difficulty
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge has granted a High Court review of the Government’s universal credit rollout after claims the removal of certain benefits under the new system had left severely disabled people in significant financial difficulty.
The review was granted after lawyers for a 52-year-old terminally ill man, who is suffering from non-Hodgkins Lymphoma and Castleman’s disease, said the new system had caused him to lose £178 a month after he was transferred on to the new all-in-one payments system.
The man, identified only as TP, had been in receipt of the Severe Disability Premium and Enhanced Disability Premium, but the introduction of universal credit scrapped the existing policies, despite claims by former Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, David Gauke, that “no one will experience a reduction in the benefit they are receiving at the point of migration to universal credit where circumstances remain the same.”
A judge granted the application and has ordered the action to be fast-tracked to a date between May and July of this year.
Law firm Leigh Day, arguing on TP’s behalf, said the new system undermines the Government’s outlined intentions that universal credit would focus additional support on the severely disabled.
“We believe that by taking away these essential benefits from some of the most vulnerable people in society, the government has acted unlawfully,” said partner Tessa Gregory.
“For my client who suffers from a terminal illness and is undergoing gruelling chemotherapy the additional benefits are quite literally a lifeline. At a time like this he should be focussing on his health not worrying about his benefits being axed by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). We believe the safety net, which any one of us might need to rely on, is being unlawfully eroded by the way universal credit is being introduced.”
Universal credit merges six existing benefits into one. The Government has insisted it will simplify the existing system and save money in the long term. But it has been fiercely opposed by campaigners and opposition MPs, who claim it has allowed the Department of Work and Pensions to make further cuts to the welfare system.
A DWP spokesperson said: “We are unable to comment on the specifics of this case while the review continues.
“We are committed to supporting people into work while making sure the right care is in place for those that can’t.
“Unlike the previous system, universal credit is more targeted and support is focused on those who need it most. Transitional protection is also available for those people who move onto universal credit from other benefits, provided their circumstances stay the same.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments