Union to ballot train guards on strike action
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.More than 5,000 guards at train companies all over Britain are to be balloted on strike action that would lead to severe disruption on the network.
The RMT rail union is threatening the action in protest at the refusal of train operators and Railway Safety, the organisation responsible for day-to-day operations, to restore guards' safety responsibilities.
Bob Crow, the RMT general secretary, has accused the companies of reneging on an agreement signed by all sides in 2001. Industrial action could hit services run by 21 operators by the middle of next month ahead of a national strike being threatened by train drivers aimed at re-establishing national pay bargaining.
Mr Crow said most operators had flatly refused to sign an agreement the union had reached with Great North Eastern Railway (GNER) to recognise the crucial role played by the guard. "This shameful cash-first attack on safety standards is a threat to everyone who works or travels on the railways," he said. "That means we have no other option but to ballot our train crew members – with a strong recommendation that they vote for action."
He said the safety role of guards was written out of the rule book just days before the Ladbroke Grove accident in 1999, which killed 31 people.
The union said yesterday that most train operators and Railway Safety Limited had reneged on a promise to abide by an independent assessment of the role of guards, which found there needed to be specific provision for such duties in the industry's rule book.
"Under Railway Safety Limited, it seems that railway safety has become very limited indeed," said Mr Crow. "For most operators, safety has come a poor second to profit."
A spokesman for the Association of Train Operating Companies said: "Threats of strike action should have no place in this matter. There is an established procedure for considering changes to the safety role of the guard. The train companies are following that procedure and the RMT should too."
Operators not affected by the threat of action are GNER and the Island Line on the Isle of Wight, which agree with the union, Thameslink and West Anglia Great Northern (WAGN) – where there are no guards – and Eurostar, Heathrow Express and Gatwick Express, which are not part of the bargaining group.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments