UN nuclear disarmament talks: UK Government not attending discussions labelled 'reckless and irresponsible'
'I don't think it’s taking nuclear disarmament seriously,' Green Party leader Caroline Lucas tells The Independent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government has been called “reckless and irresponsible” after it refused to send a single representative to United Nations (UN) talks about a ban on nuclear weapons.
The Foreign Office revealed that no one from the UK attended a February meeting ahead of the negotiations and no one would go to the discussions when they take place later this month.
It was responding to a parliamentary question by Green Party co-leader Caroline Lucas, who told The Independent that it showed the Government was being “massively hypocritical” and failing in its commitment to working towards a world without nuclear weapons.
“I don't think it’s taking nuclear disarmament seriously and it's hugely reckless and irresponsible,” she said.
In October, UN member states voted overwhelmingly to start talks for the treaty.
A total of 123 nations favoured the measure, but the UK was strongly opposed to it, along with other nuclear powers including Russia, Israel and France.
“The Government has said it's committed to multilateral nuclear disarmament," Ms Lucas said, adding that whenever ministers are asked to get rid of Trident – the UK's nuclear weapons system – they "always say we're not going to because it's unilateral."
The Brighton MP said: “Now there's opportunity to have a multinational set of negotiations and they're not even bothering to turn up. I just think it's mind blowing.”
Although the talks may not immediately agree on an outright ban, Ms Lucas said they were an important step towards reducing nuclear weapons internationally.
“Essentially what such a major global moment does is to help delegitimize the weapons," she said, "that can't be underestimated.
"So although clearly we're not going to have the nuclear weapons states signing up by June, the very existence of that treaty will make it more likely that those countries that have them will begin to negotiate to get rid of them."
Ms Lucas has applied to the Backbench Business Committee to get parliamentary time allocated to debating whether the UK should be represented at the UN talks.
In response to Ms Lucas's parliamentary question, Sir Alan Duncan, the Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs said: “The UK did not participate on the organisational meeting on negotiating a treaty to prohibit nuclear weapons on 16 February and will not attend the substantive negotiations starting on 27 March.
“We do not believe these negotiations will lead to effective progress on nuclear disarmament.
“The best way to achieve this goal is through gradual multilateral disarmament negotiated using a step-by step approach and within existing international frameworks.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments