Tube PPP backers in line for 20% profit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The companies backing the £16bn public private partnership of the London Underground could get up to a fifth of their money back every year, the Government will admit tomorrow.
Stephen Byers, the Transport Secretary, has said he will publish the contracts for the three PPPs for the Tube tomorrow. Two have been won by the Metronet consortium, backed by Balfour Beatty and WS Atkins among others, and the other by Tubelines, whose shareholders include Amy, Jarvis and Bechtel. London's Mayor Ken Livingstone has claimed that the backers could make annual returns of 35 per cent on their investment.
This is an exaggeration. The contracts will reveal that the expected profits will be between 15 per cent and 20 per cent per annum.
Initially, the backers will put around £700m of equity investment into the project, and will raise a further £4bn for the debt markets.
This will be enough money for the first seven years of what is intended to be a 30-year contract.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments