Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

True stories from the Great Railway Disaster; No 50: so you want to open a new station ?

Sunday 31 December 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CHRIS SHAW, borough planning officer for Tewkesbury in Gloucestershire, is appalled by the escalating cost of reopening the main-line station at Ashchurch.

In 1992 reopening was estimated to cost pounds 353,000. In June 1995 Railtrack put it at pounds 1,025,000. In other words, the price had nearly trebled in three years.

Railtrack explained to Mr Shaw that "the parts of British Rail supplying engineering services are being prepared for privatisation and have been learning about the costs involved in subcontracting". Mr Shaw cites one example of extra costs: as site workers are no longer British Rail employees, safety supervision has to be purchased at a cost of pounds 70,000. Another is that "Railtrack now have penalty clauses in its train path contracts . . . such that if engineering works delay trains, then compensation is payable". This estimated expense has been added to the station costing.

As a result, Mr Shaw writes, "no further station reopenings will take place in the county while project costs remain at this inflated level".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in