True stories from the Great Railway Disaster
A weekly chronicle of the absurdities caused by the Government's privatisation programme; No 16: so you want to use the toilet (part 2) ?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALLAN HORSFALL has been campaigning for a long time to get toilets reinstated at Bolton station after the main toilets were closed three years ago because of vandalism and lack of maintenance. He was within a whiff of success until the advent of the break-up of the railways in anticipation of privatisation.
The Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive was prepared to make a grant for improvements at Bolton station that included "a new shelter, a chargeman's office and toilet facilities, including disabled and night facilities". Although this was delayed for a couple of years because of a shortage offunds, the PTE had hoped to proceed last year, but was unable to do so (according to a Mr Woolvin, its rail services manager) because "of the changes in procedures and organisations in the run-up to privatisation".
The problem for the PTE is that if it makes a grant to improve the station, leasing charges or track access charges to the train operators may then be increased by Railtrack to reflect improvements made to the property. The PTE already pays substantial subsidies to support services in the Manchester area and it does not want to have to pay more because of grants it has given to make those improvements.
As Mr Woolvin put it, "I am sure you realise that it would be invidious if the investment of public money in funding improvements led to an increased demand for subsidy from the operators." So, until the matter is sorted out, Boltonian rail passengers will just have to hold on a bit longer.
Meanwhile, the Daily Star reports that BR has found a newuse for toilet roll. Passenger Chris Meek disputed a fare on an InterCity train between York and Leeds and the guard took down his details on toilet paper, claiming that he had no official notepaper because of cutbacks.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments