Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Traffic 'will increase 25% in seven years'

Barrie Clement Transport Editor
Monday 16 June 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Motorists face a 25 per cent increase in traffic over the next seven years if the Government continues to "do nothing", says research published today.

Falling petrol prices and more fuel-efficient vehicles will mean greater congestion with some roads coming to a virtual standstill, a report published by the Independent Transport Commission says.

The only way to avoid the "driver's despair scenario'' would be by introducing a nationwide policy of congestion charging, it says. Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Transport, has indicated he is in favour of such a scheme. But he estimated it would take 25 years to implement.Under the petrol pricing and taxation regime, motorists pay about 8.5p a mile, but if a variable congestion charge were introduced, that would be cut to 4p a mile in rural areas and 17p in London, Manchester and the West Midlands.

The study, Transport Pricing and Investment in England, written by Stephen Glaister and Dan Graham, says: "Fuel duty is a blunt instrument which fails to distinguish those circumstances in which there is a case for reducing traffic from those in which people and industry could enjoy greater mobility at lower cost.''

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in