Swansea Bay tidal lagoon project turned down by government
'Instead of supporting a potential success, the government has decided to continue propping up a failure'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The £1.3bn Swansea Bay tidal lagoon has been rejected by the government, crushing hopes it would spark an “economic revolution” in Wales.
Following 18 months of analysis, ministers have decided that the renewable energy project will not receive any subsidy support, despite independent experts stating that it would be a “no regrets policy”.
Supporters hoped the initiative could be a "pathfinder" project that would pave the way for more tidal lagoons across the UK.
However, business secretary Greg Clark told the House of Commons the project “however novel and appealing” did not demonstrate value for money for consumers and the general public.
A report on the project released in January 2017 concluded that the project would bring huge benefits, and could be a highly cost-effective way of generating electricity.
The report stated it was “beyond question” that the local economy would benefit, and that it would be cheaper than offshore wind.
However, opponents of the scheme voiced concerns about the affordability of the technology, as well as its impact on the environment.
Tidal Lagoon Power – the company behind the development – claimed the tidal lagoon’s turbines would have been capable of powering over 150,000 homes for around 120 years, but was in need of government subsidies similar to those given to nuclear developments to undertake its project.
In the proposed development, a large U-shaped wall constructed in Swansea bay would be lined with turbines that generate electricity as they are driven by the rise and fall of the tide.
The company claimed the Swansea project would service more than 150,000 properties and it was cheaper than nuclear power.
Previously, the developers had asked the government for a 90-year contract with an average strike price, or guaranteed price for the electricity generated, of £89.90 per megawatt hour.
Hinkley Point C, the new nuclear power station in Somerset, was given a strike price of £92.50/MWh for 35 years.
The Welsh government had promised £200m to help build the lagoon, with South Wales West Assembly Member Suzy Davies stating it would be an opportunity to “unleash an economic revolution in Wales”.
However, government reresentatives suggested this figure would not be enough to cover the costs of such an ambitious project.
Chief executive of trade association RenewableUK, Hugh McNeal, said: “This decision is deeply disappointing and shows a lack of vision.
“Tidal lagoons have massive potential to meet our national energy needs and create jobs, as well as bringing industrial-scale economic benefits to the UK – including opportunities to export worldwide. The review commissioned by the government on this innovative technology found that it can deliver secure power at a price that’s competitive in the long term."
Emma Gibson, Senior Campaigner at Greenpeace UK, said the government had "rejected the opportunity to become the international leader in developing tidal lagoons that produce clean energy day and night, and whose prices would have fallen after this first demonstration project."
Instead she said it was "preparing to throw billions of taxpayers’ hard earned cash at a nuclear industry that has been relying on hand outs for 60 years, as its prices just keep spiralling and delivery is delayed year after year. Instead of supporting a potential success, the government has decided to continue propping up a failure."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments