Streatham attack: Emergency law could see terrorists released from prisons without restrictions, government warned
Watchdog warns of ‘cliff edge’ if Parole Board refuses to release offenders under licence conditions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Emergency legislation to delay the release of terrorist prisoners could create a dangerous “cliff edge” where they are freed without any restrictions, the government has been warned.
Under plans announced in the wake of the Streatham attack, which was launched by a terror convict days after he was released from jail, automatic release will be cancelled for inmates who have already been sentenced.
The Parole Board does not currently have any say in the release of terror offenders on determinate sentences like Sudesh Amman, who are freed halfway through their term regardless of risk.
But under the new law the board would assess all inmates convicted of terrorism and keep them inside for longer if they are still thought to be a threat.
The Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation warned that offenders would still have to be released at the end of determinate sentences, which are currently served half in prison and half under licence.
“The difficulty which any new legislation will have to address for this cohort of terrorist offenders is, what happens if the Parole Board refuses to release the offender before their sentence expires?” Jonathan Hall QC told The Independent.
“If their sentence has expired, they cannot be released subject to conditions, and cannot be recalled for bad behaviour. There is a real risk of unintended consequences.”
Mr Hall urged the government to avoid creating a “cliff edge” where terror offenders are freed from prison without licence conditions, which can include deradicalisation programmes and restrictions on internet usage, movement and association.
The warnings come as one of the victims of the attack was named in reports on Tuesday as teacher Monika Luftner.
In a statement, St Bede’s Catholic Infant & Nursery School in Lambeth said a member of staff was making a “good recovery after experiencing a shocking attack”.
On Monday, Robert Buckland told MPs emergency legislation would see the Parole Board risk assess terror convicts for potential release after serving two-thirds of their sentence, rather than the current half.
“The underlying principle has to be that offenders will no longer be released early automatically and that any release before the end of their sentence will be dependent on risk assessment by the Parole Board,” the justice secretary added.
“We will ensure that the functions of the Parole Board are strengthened to deal even more effectively with the specific risk that terrorists pose to public safety.”
Mr Buckland said emergency legislation would apply retrospectively to terrorist prisoners given standard determinate sentences like Amman’s.
Downing Street said there would also be a full review of the maximum prison sentences for terror offences, including looking at whether offenders of all levels of seriousness should be held in jail indefinitely until the Parole Board assesses they are no longer a threat to the public.
The plans have raised concerns over radicalisation inside British prisons, where recent cases have shown that terrorists are able to network and spread extremism.
Amman’s mother claimed he had been further radicalised inside HMP Belmarsh, where a former inmate told The Times he openly stated his wish to carry out a terror attack and conducted a mock Isis execution.
There are already up to 800 flagged extremists in British jails – almost four times the number of terrorist prisoners – and there have been repeated official warnings about Islamist radicalisation including from the Parole Board and a government review.
The Prison Reform Trust urged the government to “proceed with caution”.
Director Peter Dawson said: “Terrorism has always posed a very particular set of challenges for criminal justice systems.
“There are examples from history both in this country and overseas where poorly thought through or disproportionate reactions are likely to have made things worse rather than better in the long run. Unfair treatment or disproportionate punishment are both effective recruiting sergeants.”
Downing Street acknowledged that there was nothing to prevent prisoners being automatically released until the emergency new law is passed.
The prime minister’s official spokesman would not comment on whether they had identified any terrorists due for release before the new law comes in.
The government has not ruled out derogating – effectively partially suspending – the European Convention on Human Rights in order to apply the new measures, which are likely to be subject to legal challenges.
The Streatham stabbing was the third terror attack in just over two months to be carried out by a convicted terrorist in Britain, following the assaults at Fishmongers’ Hall in London and inside HMP Whitemoor.
Amman, who had previous convictions for cannabis and offensive weapons possession, was initially arrested for planning terror attacks in May 2018, after writing online that he was “armed and ready” and pledging allegiance to Isis.
But he was charged with the lesser offences of collecting and disseminating terrorist material after consultation with prosecutors, and handed a determinate sentence of three years and four months that saw him automatically released on 23 January.
He was being followed by undercover officers when he grabbed a knife from a shop, removed it from its packaging, and started stabbing passers-by in Streatham on Sunday.
Meanwhile, his father, Faraz Khan, has said he never thought his son “would go this far” and he did not know he had become radicalised.
Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, Mr Khan said Amman was reciting the Koran when they last spoke, a day before the attack, and he had been shocked to learn of his son’s actions.
“He never talked to me about things like that,” he said.
“He said when his mother came to see him she brought him food – that’s the kind of things he talked about.
“I told him not to be naughty, be good, and he listened.”
Scotland Yard said Amman was shot dead by police within a minute of beginning his attack, which was claimed by Isis in a generic statement on Monday morning. Both stabbing victims survived.
Around 50 terrorists are released from prison each year, according to officials, and the figure is expected to be similar in 2020 unless rules change.
Home Office data shows 41 convicted terrorists were released from jail in the year to June, as well as 12 suspects who had been held in custody but not sentenced.
Among those due for release, according to the Henry Jackson Society, is Mohammed Ghani, who threatened to kill police officers, and Britain’s youngest terrorist, who plotted to murder police in Australia.
Also on the list are at least five men who aspired to or travelled to Syria to support Isis, as well as Moinul Abedi, who was jailed in 2002 for stockpiling homemade explosives for a terror attack.
Fahim Adam, from Blackburn, who collected extremist magazines, and Mohammed Khilji, from London, who posted beheading videos on WhatsApp, could also be freed.