Campaigners in High Court battle to stop Stonehenge road tunnel
Lawyers and campaigners say government has failed to consider that two-mile tunnel risks Stonehenge losing UNESCO world heritage site
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Campaigners are set for a High Court battle with the government over plans to build a tunnel close to the great circle of Stonehenge which they claim could put the prehistoric site’s Unesco world heritage status at risk.
A group of “mostly retired” archaeologists, environmentalists, historians, transport experts, countryside campaigners and druids will try to stop the building of a two-mile road tunnel along the A303 in Wiltshire - a major route between the southeast and southwest.
Highways England (HE) says traffic on the existing single-carriageway can be a “daily struggle” for many and that the tunnel will “sort out” a road that “does not work” for people who live, work and holiday in Wiltshire and South West England.
But the Stonehenge Alliance (SA) argues that the project will greatly harm the area near Stonehenge, one of the world’s most famous monuments, which dates back to the late Neolithic Age and attracts more than a million visitors annually.
“In the face of government indifference to the harm this road will cause…we had no choice but to bring this legal action,” John Adams, SA chair, said ahead of the court show down. “As before we hope we are successful in overturning this proposed vandalism. We hope justice will be served over the next three days.”
Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site (SSWH), a company set up to bring the legal challenge and closely linked to SA, is seeking a judicial review of the government’s decision to greenlight the project, after the campaign group scored a previous victory in a ruling handed down by Mr Justice Holgate in July 2021, quashing a Development Consent Order given to HE to press ahead with the work.
In 2019, before soaring inflation hit the UK, the government put the project’s price at £1.7bn - SA claims it will end up costing £2.5bn.
Dan Snow, the British historian and television presenter, said it was “astonishing” that the government was persisting with such a “damaging scheme” when it was being met with “so much” opposition and urged ministers to “come up with something better”.
Rowan Smith, a solicitor for Leigh Day, said: “Despite this road development being so controversial, and despite important new matters which required proper scrutiny, the secretary of state ignored calls for a fresh public examination.
“Our clients consider that was unfair and potentially a breach of human rights. Also, no regard whatsoever was given to the risk that Stonehenge would lose its world heritage status if plans were approved, which our clients say was plainly irrational. We look forward to presenting these arguments to the court.”
The government declined to comment.
David Bullock, A303 project director for NE, said: “We acknowledge there is a clear process for any legal challenge, we are taking part in that legal process and we remain confident this scheme is the best solution for tackling a long-standing traffic bottleneck, improving journeys, bringing much needed relief to local communities and boosting the economy in the southwest, while conserving and enhancing the World Heritage Site.
“In the meantime, and following the granting of the scheme’s Development Consent Order, we are continuing to plan and make preparations for starting preliminary work and archaeology fieldwork on site in 2024.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments