Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Steel firm accused over safety

Stephen Castle Political Editor
Sunday 02 February 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A steel company has been accused of pressurising more than 30 workers involved in factory accidents to return to work early, or take a holiday - thus preventing its safety record from being tarnished.

Co-Steel, of Sheerness, Kent, which employs around 700 workers, manufactures bars and rods mainly for the construction industry and is the largest mill of its type in Europe.

Under existing regulations a firm must notify the authorities if workers are forced to take three days or more off work following an accident. In a House of Commons motion, Graham Allen, Labour's health and safety spokesman, said he had seen more than 30 letters from employees of the Canadian-owned company, alleging undue pressure on them to return to light duties, or to take a holiday, after accidents.

He claims that some employees had been told that colleagues would lose incentive "gainshare" payments - calculated partly on the number of days' sick leave taken - if they stayed away. Others had been telephoned and asked to return to lighter duties rather than their normal tasks.

His intervention follows a decision by the British Safety Council to withdraw its national safety award from the firm last year. The International Labour Organisation has also produced a report critical of the company.

As well as tabling an early day motion, Mr Allen has written to John Gummer, Secretary of State for the Environment, demanding an investigation. He said last night: "I would be appalled if it were proven that these sorts of immoral practices continue in a 'civilised' society."

Mr Allen's Commons motion calls on the Government to initiate an "urgent inquiry" into the validity of the company's safety statistics.

The Labour Party and a trade union have also demanded a government inquiry into the safety record of Co-Steel, which is the subject of Health and Safety Executive investigations into several incidents last year.

Co-Steel last week declined to respond to questions regarding accidents in its plant.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in