Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Shoot-to-kill' cases to be made public

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Reports into police "shoot-to-kill" cases dating from the early 1980s can no longer be kept secret, Belfast High Court ruled yesterday.

Mr Justice Gillen said he accepted a coroner's view that a public investigation was needed to look into the allegation that the state had a shoot-to-kill policy, thereby rejecting the police argument that official reports into the deaths of six people, five of them active republicans, should continue to be regarded as secret documents.

It is not yet known whether the Police Service of Northern Ireland will appeal against this outcome, which is the latest in a series of legal tussles between the authorities and relatives of those killed. An investigation into whether police planned to kill those who were shot was carried out by the former Greater Manchester Police Deputy Chief Constable John Stalker. It was later reviewed by Sir Colin Sampson of the West Yorkshire Police.

Their unpublished reports aroused much legal and political controversy. The judge said that if inquests were to maintain public confidence, those concerned must be able to participate openly.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in