Scruffy Scots on wrong side of law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Scottish people failing to take adequate care over their appearance could find themselves on the wrong side of the law, following the discovery of ancient statutes designed to uphold sartorial standards north of the border.
Academics have discovered the statutes were passed by James I of Scotland – and never repealed – to spruce up the nation's dress sense 600 years ago. It was a matter of national pride to James, who was concerned that visiting dignitaries should not be given the impression that Scottish people did not dress well.
Theoretically, anybody caught wearing holed jumpers, frayed jeans or scruffy kilts could still be fined up to £200 for wearing "ragged clothes", as the law calls them.
Dr Alastair Mann, one of the historians at St Andrews University who unearthed the laws, said: "People were a bit scruffy, and when visitors from abroad arrived we actually didn't look too well.
"At important events like Parliament there was a great fuss that people should be smartly attired, put on their Sunday best, to look impressive – so that the ambassador of Spain, when he was visiting, could see us for the country we really weren't."
James I was determined that Scots should dress in certain ways and fines were introduced. By the reign of James II, in 1450, it had risen to £200 for failing to dress accordingly – about £100,000 in today's money.
"Dress was not just a matter of choice in the medieval period – it was a mark of social rank, status and wealth," Dr Mann said.
More ambitious dressers should beware strict punishments for those who dress above their station: only lords and knights may wear silk. While fashionistas may escape censure, those who dare venture out in Rab C Nesbitt-style can expect the worst.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments