Sainsbury’s worker sacked after not paying for 30p bags for life during £30 shop
The Sainsbury’s employee was sacked after working at the London supermarket for nearly 20 years
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Sainsbury’s worker was sacked after working nearly 20 years for the supermarket because he took shopping bags without paying for them.
Niamke Doffou was let go in 2022 after failing to pay for multiple bags for life from Romford Sainsbury’s Superstore where he had worked since 2003.
Mr Doffou bought around £30 worth of food, pillows and bedding for visitors staying at his home after a busy night shift but was caught on CCTV making a number of trips to get the bags, which cost customers between 30p and 65p.
Despite claiming he was “tired and unaware of what he was doing”, the native-French speaker was hauled in front of bosses and sacked after they decided the supermarket could no longer trust him.
The East London hearing was told: “The disciplinary chair formed the view that he had deliberately selected the zero bags option on the self-checkout knowing full well he would need some to put his bulky shopping in.
Have you been affected by this incident? Email alexander.butler@independent.co.uk
“This in turn she concluded meant that Sainsbury’s could no longer have trust in Mr Doffou as an employee even if the bags did not cost as much as his shopping had.”
An employment judge agreed with the supermarket giant and threw out the claim.
Eleena Misra K.C said: “Having considered all of the evidence before me I concluded that the claim for unfair dismissal is not well founded and is therefore dismissed.
“The CCTV footage and receipt clearly proved to Sainsbury’s that Mr Doffou took bags for life without paying for them.
“Sainsbury’s carried out a reasonable and proportionate investigation into the alleged conduct and he was given a full opportunity to respond.
“Mr Doffou’s explanations were not deemed to be credible explanations and Sainsbury’s was entitled on the evidence to conclude that he had committed misconduct notwithstanding the low value of the bags taken.
“Once the decision maker had concluded that he had acted dishonestly and committed theft, it is very hard to argue that the decision to dismiss fell outside a reasonable band of responses. I find that it was within such a band.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments