Russian beauty queen Ekaterina Fields wins £3.3m payout in 'boxing match' divorce battle
The judge called the figures 'eye-watering'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Calling a bitter divorce battle a “boxing match”, a judge has given a former beauty queen a £3.3 million pay-out.
Mr Justice Holman also said that the £1 million Russian-born Ekaterina Fields and her husband Richard spent on legal bills “could have been better deployed” at the High Court yesterday.
He said that Mrs Fields, 42, should be given a £1.2 million lump sum and £320,000 a year in maintenance as her share of the couple's £6 million fortune. Mr Fields is left with £2.6 million and their apartment in New York.
The judge called the figures “eye-watering”, but said they had to be seen in the context of the lifestyle they enjoyed together.
The couple have two young children and Mrs Fields wanted £50,000 for nannies and staff, as well as £75,000 a year for holidays.
Following the judgement, according to The Daily Telegraph, Mrs Fields, said: “It will, understandably, take some time to absorb today’s judgement. After a difficult and lengthy fight to rightfully safeguard my children’s future I am hopeful that I can look forward to a bright and positive future.”
“The key aspect of my claim has been to ensure I can raise my two children appropriately and I need to assess whether the judgement will enable me to do that.”
She added her case “highlighted the difficulty mothers and children have securing what they are rightly entitled to in a divorce settlement”.
The judge said: “What I sincerely hope is that each of you take away the lesson of this bruising experience. It was a boxing match. It wasn’t edifying."
In a case which the judge said should have been easy to settle and could have avoided the publicity, the pair spent in excess of £1 million on legal expenses.
“Instead they have spent over £1 million in legal costs… That £1 million could have been better deployed in meeting their respective needs and aspirations,” said Mr Justice Holman, according to The Evening Standard.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments