Rich give smaller slice of pay to good causes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wealthy Britons behave like misers towards good causes, according to new research showing that the poor give a greater slice of their income to charity than the rich.
A survey published today by the Social Market Foundation, a leading think-tank, confirmed the finding after research into the donors of 10 of Britain's biggest charities.
Those with incomes under £5,000 donated on average £108 a year, or 4.3 per cent. Those with incomes of £20,000-£25,000 donated £503, or 2.3 per cent, while those on incomes of £40,000 or more gave £784, just 1.9 per cent. The "regressive giving" pattern is roughly the same regardless of the age, sex, education and religious affiliation of the donors.
The picture would be even more iniquitous but for the skewing effect of a small number of huge donations by the super-rich, the survey found.
Beth Egan, deputy director of the think-tank, said: "We live in a society where the rich are given a plaque in their honour if they donate £1,000, a tiny percentage of their income. But at the same time the pensioner who sends off a fiver, with a note apologising that it's not more, is not recognised at all."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments