Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Restraining children is 'cruel and degrading'

Eleanor Harding
Monday 19 July 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of Britain's largest children's charities last night condemned a secret manual for restraining young people in custody as "cruel and degrading".

The manual, which emerged yesterday after a five-year Freedom of Information battle, advises staff to adopt strategies such as elbowing a child in the ribs and driving fingers into their face.

Phillip Noyes, director of strategy and development at the NSPCC, said the practice represented a breach of human rights. "These revelations illustrate the cruel and degrading violence inflicted at times on children in custody," he said. "Even though these children have committed offences we must remember they are still children."

Physical Control in Care, published by the HM Prison Service in 2005, guides staff on what self-defence or restraint techniques can be used on young offenders in secure training centres.

The Ministry of Justice has said that restraint is always a last resort for people under the age of 18, but that staff need to be able to intervene effectively when people were at risk.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in