Relatives of Malaysians killed by British troops in the Batang Kali massacre vow to take their fight to the Supreme Court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Relatives of 24 unarmed Malaysians shot dead by British troops 65 years ago have vowed to take their fight for a fresh inquiry to the Supreme Court after a panel of judges described the original investigation as “woefully inadequate”.
The Court of Appeal found it was “probable” that the families of those killed in the notorious Batang Kali massacre would succeed if they took their case for a new investigation into the killings in colonial-era Malaya to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
The judges rejected an appeal from relatives for an immediate inquiry because English law does not yet mirror the ECHR. Instead, they said it was necessary for the Supreme Court to hear a fresh case on whether Britain’s Human Rights Act could apply retrospectively to killings which took place in the closing years of empire.
Lord Justice Kay, who led the panel of three judges, said confessions in 1969-70 by some of the Scots Guards involved in the shootings, that the rubber plantation workers were “shot down in cold blood” remained potentially significant to a fresh inquiry.
He added that the investigation carried out by the British colonial administration in 1948, which found that the victims had tried to escape, was “woefully inadequate”. A previous court ruling in 2012 found there was evidence to support the central claim of the relatives that their loved ones were executed.
Lawyers for the families said they will now take their complaint to the Supreme Court, added that the Court of Appeal had rejected a claim on behalf of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office that responsibility for the killings lay with the Malaysian authorities.
John Halford, of law firm Bindmans, said: “Some might think it remarkable that present-day human rights standards should create a duty to investigate wrongdoing by British troops in a colonial village six decades ago and its cover-up in the years that followed.
“But those standards are rooted in far older British principles, specifically the right to life and to its protection by laws to be enforced on an equal basis. The Batang Kali massacre occurred because, in Britain's Empire, its principles were sometimes abandoned.”
Quek Ngee Meng, coordinator of a campaign group for Batang Kali relatives, said: “Our journey to seek redress has not come to an end. The destination is not too far off. Either UK human rights law needs to catch up with Europe with the help of the Supreme Court, or the families will need to go to Europe for satisfaction.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments