Refugees in prison despite Blunkett pledge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One hundred and thirty asylum-seekers are being held in prison despite a pledge by David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, to abolish the practice of incarcerating refugees.
Many are behind bars because the Government has not arranged for them to be deported, they do not have genuine documents or there are fears they may abscond.
Refugee groups and opposition MPs have protested, saying that it is immoral to mix asylum-seekers with criminals. They said asylum-seekers were being dumped on the prison system despite the misgivings of prison officers and the risk to their welfare.
Simon Hughes, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said the practice was "murky and unaccountable" and accused Mr Blunkett of breaking a pledge, made in 2001, that asylum-seekers would not be housed in prisons other than in in exceptional circumstances. Mr Hughes said the Government refused to answer questions about the welfare of detainees.
The Home Office said yesterday: "The reason we keep them in prison is because there is a high level of security." A spokeswoman said some asylum-seekers were being sent to prison rather than a detention centre because it was believed they could be disruptive.
In one case, an asylum-seeker sentenced to several weeks for an offence was still behind bars nine months later because the immigration service had not dealt with his case.
Tim Baster, of Bail for Immigration Detainees, said refugees in prison had no rights to bail or access to legal help. "It's absurd that people often fleeing being thrown into prison in their own country are put in prison here."
A spokesman for the Refugee Council said: "No one could argue that keeping an asylum-seeker in prison is excusable."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments