Virtual Commons debate should be available to all MPs, committee says
Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg has announced plans to extend virtual participation for extremely vulnerable MPs until the end of March, but he stopped short of making it universal.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Virtual participation in Commons debates should be made "uniform" for all MPs as soon as possible, a committee has urged.
The Government has been criticised in recent weeks for its reluctance to bring back hybrid proceedings for the House of Commons, as per the first coronavirus lockdown in the spring when MPs could participate via video links if they were unable to travel to Parliament.
Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg announced this week plans to extend virtual participation to allow extremely vulnerable MPs to take part in debates until the end of March but stopped short of making it universal.
Mr Rees-Mogg confirmed the changes would be made following an appeal from Conservative former minister Tracey Crouch, who was diagnosed with breast cancer in June and had been unable to contribute to a breast cancer debate last week.
The Commons Procedure Committee, in a report published on Wednesday evening, has called for those changes to be applied to all MPs, no matter their circumstances.
The report concludes that there is "no justifiable case for eligibility for virtual participation in debate to be determined by reference to clinical vulnerability to Covid-19" and calls for the allowance of contributions by online video software to be made "uniform at the earliest opportunity".
Committee chair Karen Bradley said: "Virtual participation must be extended to those who need it, so the Government faces the full scrutiny of all members of the House of Commons, and not just those members it wants to scrutinise it.
"Colleagues with caring responsibilities or who have family members who are clinically extremely vulnerable are not covered by the Government's current proposals. This is unacceptable.
"MPs should not be faced with a choice between representing their constituents in key debates and protecting their loved ones."
Politicians, including committee chairs, have complained that they do not feel they are able to properly represent voters due to fears over travelling during the pandemic.
Conservative chairman of the Liaison Committee Sir Bernard Jenkin said "a significant number" of fellow chairs felt "unable to carry out their constitutional function because they cannot risk exposing themselves or their families to Covid infection".
Fellow Tory MP Philip Dunne, who chairs the Environmental Audit Committee, told a debate this week: "I haven't been able to participate in a debate since the middle of March and I do not feel that I am fulfilling my function as a member of Parliament properly."
A Government spokesman said: "The Government firmly believes that constituents are best served when Parliament meets physically to the fullest extent possible.
"The Speaker has worked hard with the House authorities to create a safe Covid-secure workplace for all who need to attend so that, just as teaching and medical professions are working in person to keep the country moving, so are MPs and peers."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments