Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scam warning over little-known phone number rule

There are reports of people being bombarded with calls from debt collectors or people contacting them to buy drugs

Martyn Landi
Friday 11 October 2024 00:04 BST
Comments
Identities and accounts could be at risk because sensitive information is often sent by text message
Identities and accounts could be at risk because sensitive information is often sent by text message

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Mobile phone users have been warned they could be at risk of hacking, nuisance calls or having their phone cut off because of little-known rules around the recycling of old numbers, Which? has warned.

The consumer group said it has found a number of risks posed by existing phone numbers that get recycled and taken on by other consumers.

It said the issue is that many new numbers given out by telecoms firms in the UK are recycled from previous owners because there is a fixed pool of 11-digit combinations, with customer demand fuelling this recycling process.

In its research on the issue, Which? surveyed more than 15,000 members and found 11% had changed their mobile number in the last decade, but crucially only 50% had updated their number with all the relevant organisations and on their various online accounts, with 10% saying they had not updated it anywhere.

As a result, the consumer group said it is concerned online identities and accounts could be at risk because sensitive information is often sent by text message, or used to confirm log-in credentials for online accounts that use two-factor authentication.

According to its research, 7% of those surveyed said they had experienced problems caused by the deactivation or reallocation of a landline or mobile number – including issues around receiving calls and messages intended for the previous owner.

Which? said it also had reports of people being bombarded with calls and messages from debt collectors or people contacting users trying to buy drugs from them.

It comes as Revolut, Chase and Modulr have agreed to join the 159 short-code phone service that people can call to speak to their bank when they are worried about a potential scam.

A new bank transfer scams code has been launched
A new bank transfer scams code has been launched (PA Archive)

The new joiners will mean that 159 covers 99.2% of UK current accounts, those behind the initiative said.

The arrival of Chase and Modulr takes the number of banking destinations on 159 up to 19, with Revolut becoming the 20th once it has completed its onboarding process in the weeks ahead.

Those who had already joined include Bank of Scotland, Barclays, Co-operative Bank, First Direct, Halifax, HSBC, Lloyds, Metro Bank, Monzo, Nationwide Building Society, NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland, Santander, Starling, Tide, TSB, and Ulster Bank.

Lisa Barber, Which? tech editor, said: “Our research shows that recycled phone numbers can cause significant problems for both the previous owner of the number and the new recipient – from the risk of being hacked to losing an emergency phone line or receiving worrying unsolicited messages.

“Ofcom should aim to improve the way providers communicate that a number is at risk of deactivation and look into the issues that recycled numbers are causing consumers.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in