The Queen 'has no intention of stepping aside for Prince Charles'
It is 'duty first, nation first. I'm going to be there', monarch reportedly says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Queen has no intention of stepping aside for Prince Charles and remains committed to her duty to the nation, it has been reported.
The 91-year-old sovereign is the world's longest-reigning living monarch but as she pledged on her 21st birthday, she insists on serving the country for her whole life.
After a series of health concerns, 96-year-old Prince Philip would be retired from public life this month.
But despite speculation she may step aside to let Prince Charles take the throne, royal insiders told The Sunday Times the Queen had stated "duty first, nation first, I'm going to be there".
Three separate senior sources have dismissed claims she will request the Regency Act, which allows the monarch to cede power to the heir and see a regent carrying out certain royal functions and duties on behalf of the sovereign.
For the Act to be requested, the monarch has to be officially declared incapable of performing royal functions by the lord chancellor, the Speaker of the House of Commons and the master of rolls.
But the sources have quashed rumours the Queen would step aside if she was still on the throne in four years time.
One source told the newspaper the Queen had always been vehement that she would not call for a regency, adding: "As long as she's healthy, regardless of her age, I don't see a regency. Other members of the royal family can just do more."
In recent years, she has reduced the number of public engagements she attends but continues to carry out her functions on state matters.
She no longer makes long haul overseas trips and other members of the royal family have been undertaking foreign tours and official state visits in her name.
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Prince William and Kate, for example caught the world's attention during the Diamond Jubilee Tour on behalf of the Queen in September 2012.
There have also been discussions about the possibility of the crown "leapfrogging" Prince Charles in favour of his son Prince William.
But this has been dismissed since it would cause a constitutional crisis, with Prince William previously saying there was "no question" of it happening.
Speaking in 2012 about his future on the throne, Prince Charles, 68, said: "Impatient? Me? What a thing to suggest! Yes of course I am. I'll run out of time soon. I shall have snuffled it if I'm not careful".
Keen to engage in public life, Prince Charles has depicted himself as a champion of environmental issues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments