Privacy rule change a boon for the unfaithful
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A change in privacy rules for telephone numbers may prove a help for those conducting an affair. The Information Commissioner has decided phone numbers are personal data, and callers must have a means of wiping theirs from computer systems.
Dialling 1475 after a call will now remove the number from the 1471 system. When the person you called checks their phone, they will simply be told "we do not have the caller's number".
Although it has always been possible to prevent your number being recorded by dialling "141" first, there has been no way to yank it retrospectively from the network.
Philip Jones, the assistant data protection registrar, illustrated the need for the "wipeout" facility in his ruling to telecoms companies in February by asking what would happen if "a call is made to a residential number by someone who knows that the person he/she wants to call is likely to be alone". He said another member of the household could identify the number, and possibly the caller, by phoning 1471. Mr Jones said the personal data of the caller would have been given against his or her wishes.
The system has been operating since last month but has not been publicised.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments