'Prince's paintings' fake, admit auctioneers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Three watercolours sold this week as originals from the brush of the Prince of Wales were probably fakes, the auctioneers who sold them admitted yesterday.
The Fellows and Sons auction house in Birmingham refunded the money of two bidders who had paid more than £20,000 for the three paintings, which were billed as originals signed by the Prince.
The auction had seen fierce bidding from America and Canada pushing the sale price to three times the expected level. But within hours of the sale, doubt was cast on the paintings' provenance by St James's Palace, which said the Prince "does not sell originals".
Stephen Whittaker, managing partner of the auction house, said it was taking the pictures off the market and refunding the purchasers. "We now feel certain that these paintings are probably copies of original works," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments