Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Prince Charles's 'role' in barracks row criticised

John Walsh
Monday 14 June 2010 00:00 BST
Comments
Prince Charles
Prince Charles

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of Britain's leading architects, Sir Nicholas Grimshaw, has accused Prince Charles of "interfering" with public planning, and said that he "needs to make up his mind" about his public and private role.

Sir Nicholas's comments follow the dispute over the redevelopment of the Chelsea Barracks site in central London, in which Prince Charles involved himself by writing to the site's owners, the Qatari royal family, to object to their choice of architect, Richard Rogers.

"I just don't think it's right," Sir Nicholas said. "Prince Charles has to make his mind up about what he wants to be. He can write to the Qatari prince to say, 'Look, I don't like your scheme'. But I don't think that's the right role for him, if he's an employee of the British public.

In an interview with The Independent, Sir Nicholas, who is president of the Royal Academy, also said that he thought the Government "didn't take seriously enough" the need for quality in public buildings.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in