Plans to regulate sale-and-rent-back schemes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Companies offering controversial sale-and-rent-back schemes could be banned from using exploitative advertising and high-pressure sales tactics, it was announced today.
City watchdog the Financial Services Authority is also calling for consumers to be given a cooling off period after they have signed up to one of the schemes, while firms will be banned from cold calling and dropping promotional leaflets through letter boxes.
It is also proposing stopping firms from using emotive terms such as "mortgage rescue", "fast sale" or promising they can get "cash quickly" in promotional literature.
The proposals aim to protect vulnerable consumers from being exploited by the schemes, under which companies buy the homes of people who face having them repossessed and then rent them back to them.
The rapidly growing sector has come in for heavy criticism following claims that some companies pay less than 60% of the market value for properties, while others levy steep rent increases and some evict people after just 12 months.
Today's proposals build on the FSA's interim regulation of the sector, which was introduced at the beginning of July and requires all firms offering the schemes to be authorised by the FSA.
Other proposals for the full regime, which will come in on June 30 2010, include a requirement for firms to check consumers can afford the deal they are being offered and that sale-and-rent-back is right for them.
In some cases, initial rent payments have been set at unaffordable levels, while in other cases people who have taken out one of the schemes have lost benefits they were previously entitled to.
The FSA also wants firms to make it clear to consumers how long they will be able to stay in their homes following reports that some companies suggested people could rent their homes for years, when in reality the tenancy was only guaranteed for six to 12 months.
Ed Harley, FSA head of mortgage policy, said: "Sale-and-rent-back can be the right solution for some consumers, but many of the people typically targeted are financially vulnerable and have been badly hit by the experience.
"The FSA's proposed new rules will help to protect consumers. We want to prevent high-pressure and inappropriate sales and help consumers understand sale-and-rent-back products, so they only enter into sale-and-rent-back where it is an appropriate and sustainable solution for them."
The consultation will run until November 30.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments