‘Unlawful, unnecessary and destructive’: Agency told to restore bridge after filling its arch with concrete
National Highways poured tonnes of concrete under the bridge in a bid to make it safer. Now the agency has been told to restore it to its original condition
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Highways chiefs have been ordered to restore a 100-year-old railway bridge to its original condition after filling its arch with hundreds of tonnes of concrete.
Congham Bridge in Norfolk was filled by England’s national road agency in 2021 during work it said was needed to make the crossing safe.
National Highways poured tonnes of concrete under the bridge, which cost them more than £126,000.
This sparked outrage among locals and now West Norfolk Council have ordered the agency to reverse the filling of the historic bridge, which was built in 1923.
The structure was built following the designs of engineer William Marriot and was part of the Midland and Great Northern Joint Railway network.
The railway line was forced to close in 1959, as parts of the line were in bad condition following the Second World War.
Graeme Bickerdike from the HRE Group, railway heritage campaigners who challenged National Highways, said he is ‘delighted’ that the structure will return to its previous state.
He said: “We are obviously delighted by the planning committee’s refusal of this retrospective planning application.
“National Highways’ actions at Congham bridge were unlawful, unnecessary and destructive, undermining trust and confidence in its custodianship of our great railway heritage.
“We look forward to Congham Bridge seeing the light of day again and being sympathetically repaired.
“However, we note National Highways’ intention to appeal the council’s unanimous decision.
“Alongside its misapplication of emergency permitted development rights in this case, it proves once again that the company does not respect the democratic process.”
Hélène Rossiter, head of the historical railways estate at National Highways said it was intending to appeal the council’s decision.
She said: “National Highways is proud of our role in preserving the Historical Railways Estate for the nation.
“We note the decision made by the planning committee.
“While we respect the views expressed, we do not feel that the decision adequately reflects the safety concerns we have for Congham Road bridge and are planning to ask the planning inspectorate to review it on appeal.
“Decisions we made at this site were driven first and foremost by safety.”
This is the second time National Highways have been forced to restore a historic bridge.
Engineers are currently digging out thousands of tonnes of concrete from Great Musgrave Bridge in Cumbria after the council ordered the agency to restore it.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments