No charges will be brought over shooting of London lawyer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Police marksmen who shot death barrister Mark Saunders will not face charges, the Crown Prosecution Service announced yesterday after reviewing the case.
Sally Walsh, of the CPS, said: "There remains insufficient evidence to charge any officer in relation to the tragic death of Mark Saunders."
The divorce lawyer was killed as he levelled a shotgun at officers surrounding his Chelsea home. An inquest jury accused police of tactical blunders but ruled that the marksmen acted lawfully.
Mr Saunders, a depressed alcoholic, had been binge-drinking. He had been granted a firearms licence despite his drink problem and depression.
Prosecutors ruled out charging more senior officers with negligence, misconduct or breaches of health and safety laws. One officer, known only as Alpha Zulu 8 (AZ8), from the CO19 specialist firearms unit, still faces an investigation into claims he inserted song lyrics into his inquest testimony.
An Independent Police Complaints Commission report into the shooting found the Met's strategy "appropriate and within national and force guidelines". But it had concerns about firearms licences, confusion over the role of senior officers and a lack of options for dealing with vulnerable people.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments