Navy chief warns against seeing Afghanistan as 'only game in town'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain must look "beyond Afghanistan" and ensure it has the flexibility to deal with future conflicts and threats to security, the head of the Royal Navy said today.
First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope paid tribute to Britain's troops in Afghanistan but warned against viewing the conflict as the "only game in town."
"We need to ensure that we, as a nation, have the strategic flexibility to deal not just with Afghanistan, but also the broad range of other threats and challenges to our national interests today and in the future," he told a defence breakfast meeting held in the City of London.
He added that Britain should be prepared for "surprises and strategic shocks" citing the Falklands War as such an event. "It came in from the left field," he said.
In his speech he warned that the so-called "soft power" work of the Armed Forces - in areas such as humanitarian work and peace mission support - depended on the "underpinning credibility" of "hard power" or the ability to fight and win wars.
His remarks come amid a review of defence policy with fears that major defence equipment programmes are on the line.
The comments also come after the chief of the army, General Sir David Richards, called last night for a "radical" shift in priorities away from "hugely expensive" equipment towards getting more troops on the ground.
Admiral Stanhope, breaking off from his set speech, insisted that "much" of what General Sir David had said "resonated" with his own speech today.
He said: "Whilst there is a desire to see a split between us and indeed, if I may say so, a frenzy of "chiefs again at loggerheads" - we are not, what we are trying to do is pursue a clear well-articulated debate about what defence needs."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments