Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

National Trust votes against banning trail hunting to dismay of animal rights campaigners

‘It’s disgraceful, and the National Trust should be ashamed’, says anti-hunt campaigner

Claire Hayhurst,Emily Beament
Saturday 21 October 2017 23:24 BST
Comments
Trail hunting was taken up by many countryside groups with the introduction of the fox-hunting ban
Trail hunting was taken up by many countryside groups with the introduction of the fox-hunting ban (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

National Trust members have narrowly voted down a proposal to ban legal “trail hunting” on the organisation’s land.

Members who put forward the resolution called on the National Trust not to permit trail hunting, in which a scent is laid for hounds and the hunt to follow.

During the charity’s annual general meeting in Swindon, Wiltshire, they said the practice is allowing illegal hunting of foxes, deer and other animals with dogs.

Those fighting the proposal said hunts were working within the law, and claimed the charity was being used “as a political football”.

The charity’s board of trustees brought in new measures for licencing legal hunts, including forbidding laying fox-based scents, in August.

In total, 30,686 members voted for the proposal to ban trail hunting, while 30,985 voted against – a difference of just 299 votes.There were 1,925 abstentions from the vote.

Results of the vote will be considered by the trustees of the charity at a meeting in November.

The trustees previously said the revised process for licensing trail hunts would allow the Trust to meet conservation aims, as well as welcome people and accommodate users from a broad range of constituencies.

Since the ban on hunting with dogs came into force in 2005, the National Trust has licensed legal trail hunting on its land as one of number of activities it allows.

The Trust insists it monitors the activities it licenses and has taken action against trail hunts on six occasions over the past five years.

Hunts have had licences removed or suspended following reports by National Trust staff and members, it is understood.

Last year, 79 licences were issued to 67 hunts for use of National Trust land. The charity has five million members.

Applications have been received since the new measures came into force in August, ahead of the hunting season beginning in November.

Anti-hunt campaigners groaned as the vote was announced at the annual general meeting, at the STEAM museum in Swindon.

Protesters gathered outside the AGM from Saturday morning to support the vote to ban trail hunting, exempt hunting and exercising hounds on Trust land.

A spokesman for the National Trust said: “National Trust members at today’s annual general meeting have voted against a resolution for the cessation of trail hunting on all land belonging to the charity.

“Prior to the vote, the charity’s board of trustees had recommended that the activity should be allowed to continue after recent improvements in licensing conditions to further safeguard conservation and access on the Trust’s land.

“The conservation charity has been carefully listening to both sides of a highly polarised and passionate debate for years.

“We are pleased members have had the opportunity to debate this issue and have voted to support the trustees’ position.”

Helen Beynon said she started the motion with other National Trust members after witnessing hunts claiming to follow trails but actually chasing animals.

“I believe the only reason our motion has failed is because most National Trust members haven’t seen it with their own eyes,” she said.

She added: “It’s disgraceful, and the National Trust should be ashamed.”

But Polly Portwin, head of hunting at the Countryside Alliance, slammed the resolution as “ill-informed, unnecessary and a waste of money”.

Press Association

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in