National Trust concerns over planning move
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The National Trust today voiced "grave concerns" over Government proposals aimed at dramatically simplifying the planning system, warning of "damaging development" not seen since the 1930s.
Ministers said they wanted to slash 1,000 pages of policy to just 52, while continuing to protect the green belt and areas of natural or scientific beauty.
But the National Trust said the proposed changes could lead to "unchecked" development in the countryside because of a core presumption that the default to any proposed development would be "yes".
The town and country planning system had served the country well, enabling growth, while protecting open countryside and preventing sprawl, said the trust.
Fiona Reynolds, the trust's director general, said: "Those planning principles remain as necessary today as when they were first established.
"Weakening protection now risks a return to the threat of sprawl and uncontrolled development that so dominated public debate in the 1930s.
"The National Trust believes in growth as we all do - but not at any cost. Development that works must pass a triple bottom line test, by showing that it meets the needs of people and the environment as well as the economy.
"Despite some warm words to this effect, the document makes it clear that development is to be encouraged, even urging local authorities to promote more development than is in the plan and over-allocate land for housing.
"The Government's proposals allow financial considerations to dominate, and with this comes huge risk to our countryside, historic environment and the precious local places that people value."
Business groups welcomed the Government's proposals, saying they would help boost economic growth and create jobs.
PA
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments