MS sufferer takes suicide case to appeal court
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Primary progressive multiple sclerosis sufferer Debbie Purdy today took her legal battle to clarify the law on assisted suicide to the Court of Appeal.
Ms Purdy wants to know if her husband, Cuban violinist Omar Puente, will be prosecuted if he helps her travel abroad to die in a country where the practice is legal.
In England and Wales, aiding and abetting suicide is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Ms Purdy, 45, from Undercliffe, Bradford, West Yorkshire, said she was "disappointed and shocked" when the High Court recently rejected her bid to obtain legal certainty and peace of mind.
Today Lord Pannick QC, appearing for Ms Purdy, argued the High Court judges had gone wrong in law.
The appeal is being heard by the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge and Lord Justice Lloyd and Lord Justice Ward over two days.
As Ms Purdy and her husband listened in court, Lord Pannick argued that the Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, should be required to issue specific policy guidelines.
Such guidelines already exist for crimes of domestic violence, bad driving and football-related offences.
Lord Pannick told the judges the appeal concerned "whether the Director has a legal duty to adopt and publish a policy as to the criteria to be applied by him, and by Crown prosecutors on his behalf, in deciding whether to bring a prosecution for aiding and abetting suicide, contrary to the Suicide Act".
Lack of proper guidance infringed Ms Purdy's Article 8 right to private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights, he argued.
In October, Lord Justice Scott Baker and Mr Justice Aikens, sitting at London's High Court, expressed sympathy for the couple, and others in a similar position.
But they ruled the Code of Practice for Crown Prosecutors already issued by the DPP, coupled with the general safeguards of administrative law, satisfied human rights convention standards and met the need for "clarity and foreseeability".
Ms Purdy, whose legal action is supported by Dignity in Dying - formerly the Voluntary Euthanasia Society - was diagnosed with primary progressive MS in 1995 and has been a wheelchair user since 2001.
Ms Purdy says she wants to "live forever".
However, she is a member of Dignitas, the Swiss organisation which operates specialist euthanasia clinics.
Now gradually losing strength in her upper body, she plans to travel to Switzerland to end her life if her condition becomes unbearable.
Her lawyers argue that, unless the law is clarified, her own life will be shortened as she will have to travel earlier because her husband will not be able to assist her without risking jail.
Dignitas opened in 1998 and has so far helped over 100 UK citizens end their lives. It currently has upward of 694 UK members.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments