MP raises fears over 'appalling and inherently unfair system' of out-of-hours legal judgments
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MPs are to consider the issue of out-of-hours Court of Protection cases after The Independent revealed that judges were being forced to make life or death decisions over the phone.
John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP, tabled an Early Day Motion on Monday, calling on the Justice Select Committee to look into what he described as an appalling and inherently unfair system. He was concerned about decisions being made in the Court of Protection, which decides welfare issues on behalf of those deemed incapable of choosing for themselves, by judges over the phone instead of at a full hearing.
Mr Hemming said there was a need for greater scrutiny after it emerged that nobody knew how many such judgments had been made. In his motion Mr Hemming, chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Family Law and the Court of Protection, said applications for one party risked “creating a judicial momentum that families have difficulty in resisting”.
A spokesman for the Justice Select Committee said it would consider the motion at its next meeting. The Ministry of Justice said that out-of-hours decisions were made with the “same degree of seriousness and diligence as any other judicial decision”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments