Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Shoppers unknowingly buying no-stun religious meat in supermarkets

Up to 90,500 animals slaughtered as kosher - condemned by vets as cruel - may have been sold unlabelled

Jane Dalton
Tuesday 19 February 2019 17:07 GMT
Comments
Shoppers are unknowingly buying meat from non-stunned animals as labelling is not compulsory, the RSPCA says
Shoppers are unknowingly buying meat from non-stunned animals as labelling is not compulsory, the RSPCA says (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Shoppers have been unwittingly buying meat from animals that were not stunned when killed under religious rules because it is going unlabelled in supermarkets, a consumer watchdog has warned.

Up to 90,500 animals that were slaughtered as kosher – mostly chickens – could have ended up on store shelves with no wording to tell consumers how the meat was produced, the Food Standards Agency said in a report.

The meat had been rejected as “unfit for religious consumption”, it said.

The revelation prompted both vets’ leaders and the RSPCA to renew calls for a national ban on no-stun slaughter.

Some animals due for religious consumption are stunned, but the figures revealed last year more than 94 million animals were slaughtered without the practice taking place - an average of three animals per second.

The proportion of animals stunned before slaughter for halal meat last year dropped significantly, the figures also showed.

Experts say killing without stunning is cruel as animals still feel pain and distress during a prolonged death.

Regulations allow non-stun slaughter provided the meat is consumed only by religious communities.

But there is no law forcing food companies or supermarkets to say whether stunning took place so most supermarket shoppers are unaware of the background to their meat.

Dr Marc Cooper, of the RSPCA, said: “What is particularly disturbing is that 90,000 of the 2.9 million non-stunned animals slaughtered for kosher-certified meat were rejected as being ‘unfit for religious consumption’.

“The new figures suggest that non-stun slaughter is being carried out far more often than is required and is being exported and used outside the local community, so breaching the intent if not the letter of the law.”

Non-stun slaughter is being carried out far more often than is required

Dr Marc Cooper

The report said: “It is unclear whether or not hind quarters [from animals killed for kosher-certified meat] are generally sent on for wider consumption.”

Iceland, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark and Flanders in Belgium have all banned no-stun slaughter, and the European Parliament last week voted for the European Union Commission to halt the practice.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

British Veterinary Association president Simon Doherty said: “For anything up to 20 seconds in sheep and two minutes in cattle, an animal may still experience pain and distress if its throat is cut without prior stunning. Vets would therefore like to see a ban on non-stun slaughter to prevent the suffering of millions of animals.”

The RSPCA, which said its concern was not over expression of religious belief but animal welfare, called on the government to ensure trade deals with other countries did not include non-stun meat and to make labelling compulsory, until it introduced a no-stun ban.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in