Jailed banker's wife who spent £16m in Harrods attempts to overturn 'McMafia' wealth order
Zamira Hajiyeva faces losing £11.5m home after husband jailed for fraud and embezzlement
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The wife of a jailed "fat cat international banker" is fighting to overturn the UK's first unexplained wealth order at the Court of Appeal.
Zamira Hajiyeva, who spent more than £16m at Harrods in a decade, faces losing her home in Knightsbridge, central London, which was purchased for £11.5m in 2009 by a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands.
Her husband, Jahangir Hajiyev, was the chairman of the state-controlled International Bank of Azerbaijan from 2001 until his resignation in 2015. He was later sentenced to 15 years in prison for fraud and embezzlement.
But Ms Hajiyeva, 56, is to argue her husband's conviction - which she says was "the central feature" of the National Crime Agency’s application for the unexplained wealth order (UWO) – followed a “grossly unfair trial” in their native Azerbaijan.
Her barrister, James Lewis QC, told senior judges in London on Thursday that Mr Hajiyev's lawyers had not been permitted to cross-examine key witnesses or call any witnesses of their own during the trial.
He submitted that "shorn of Mr Hajiyev's conviction, it is wholly unrealistic to suggest that the NCA could have sought and obtained the UWO".
Ms Hajiyeva was the first person to be made subject to a UWO, a new power brought into force last January under so-called McMafia laws - named after the BBC organised crime drama and the book which inspired it.
A UWO allows the NCA to seize someone's assets if they believe the owner is a politically exposed person (PEP) - someone from outside the European Economic Area in a position of power that makes them liable to bribery or corruption - and they are unable to explain the source of their wealth.
But Mr Lewis argued that Mr Hajiyev was not a PEP because the law which introduced UWOs required him to have been "entrusted with prominent public functions by an international organisation or by a state".
He added the NCA had "seriously mischaracterised" Mr Hajiyev's job by describing him as a "government official," arguing the International Bank of Azerbaijan was not a "state-owned enterprise".
He submitted: "The reality is that Mr Hajiyev was the chairman of Azerbaijan's largest bank ... in which the Azerbaijani government had a 50.2 per cent stake in 2008, rising to 60 per cent in 2013.
"Mr Hajiyev was therefore no more a 'government functionary' than Sir Howard Davies, chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland (in which the UK government has a 73 per cent stake)."
In written submissions, Jonathan Hall QC, for the NCA, said Ms Hajiyeva's interpretation of the law was "unsustainable", submitting that the International Bank of Azerbaijan was a state-owned enterprise and that Mr Hajiyev was a PEP.
UWOs "enable enforcement authorities to pursue matters of substantial public interest", Mr Hall added.
He said: "There is a strong domestic and international public interest in investigating, deterring and preventing serious crime - including money laundering and corruption - and recovering the fruits of such crime."
In a High Court ruling in October, dismissing Ms Hajiyeva's attempt to overturn the UWO, Mr Justice Supperstone said that three separate loyalty cards had been issued to her by Harrods, where she spent more than £16m between September 2006 and June 2016.
Court documents later released to the media revealed that Ms Hajiyeva ran up a bill of £600,000 in a single day during the spending spree.
The NCA subsequently seized jewellery worth more than £400,000 from Christie's over suspicions about how the items were purchased while the auction house was valuing the jewellery for Ms Hajiyeva's daughter.
In September, Ms Hajiyeva fought off an attempt to extradite her to Azerbaijan to face fraud and embezzlement charges on the grounds that she would not get a fair trial.
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett - sitting with Lord Justice Davis and Lord Justice Simon - will hear Ms Hajiyeva's challenge over a single day and judgment is expected to be reserved.
Additional reporting by PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments