Married couple 'too young' to live in the UK
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A married couple lost a High Court battle yesterday against a Government immigration policy aimed at combating forced marriages.
Amber Aguilar, 18, from Friern Barnet, north London, had to move abroad to continue living with her Chilean husband, Diego Andres Aguilar Quila, 19, when his student visa expired.
Under the immigration policy, Mr Aguilar is being refused a fresh visa to live in the UK with his wife until both reach the age of 21.
Christopher Jacobs, representing the couple, argued the teenagers were being penalised because of an "irrational and unreasonable" refusal by the Home Office to allow exceptions in cases where marriages plainly had not been forced.
He argued there had been a violation of the couple's right to family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
But yesterday Mr Justice Burnett ruled that the Home Secretary, Alan Johnson, had not acted irrationally and the legal challenge must be dismissed. The judge said "no lack of respect under Article 8" had been demonstrated.
The judge upheld submissions by the Government that it was not "disproportionate" to require couples to live abroad for a period to meet a policy with "the legitimate and important aim of combating forced marriages".
The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) brought the test case, warning the Government's inflexibility was "tearing families apart".
The JCWI said the couple were currently sharing a single bed in a cramped home in Santiago where they were unable to find work and there was no welfare system. They were described in court as "the unlucky victims" of the new "no under-21s" policy, which took effect five days after their marriage in November last year.
In the past, once a woman reached 18, she would have been entitled to apply to have her husband live with her in the UK. Now both partners in a marriage have to be 21 before a visa can be issued to a foreign national.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments