Majestic move for equality (so long as you have Windsor blood)
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Female members of the Royal Family are to be given equality with men in the rules of succession, under constitutional changes agreed yesterday by the 16 Commonwealth nations where the Queen is head of state.
As a result, if the first child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge is a girl, she will take precedence over any younger brothers in the order of succession.
Laws banning royals from acceding to the throne if they are married to a Roman Catholic will also be abolished, though the monarch will still have to be a member of the Church of England.
Announcing the changes at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Australia, David Cameron said the historic rules were "at odds with the modern countries that we have become". He added: "Put simply, if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were to have a little girl, that girl would one day be our queen."
Reform of the succession rules, which date to the 17th century, has long been seen as overdue in an age of greater equality between genders and faiths. But putting future princesses on an equal footing with their brothers will require amendments to much historic legislation, including the 1701 Act of Settlement and 1689 Bill of Rights, as well as laws in Commonwealth states including Canada, Jamaica, and Belize.
Any legislative changes will apply to the heirs of the Prince of Wales, so the children of William and Catherine will be affected whether or not they are born before the law is amended. Any new law is not expected to be retrospective – the Princess Royal would still be placed below her two younger brothers, the Duke of York and the Earl of Wessex.
The Most Reverend Vincent Nichols, Archbishop of Westminster and president of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales, said he welcomed the change: "This will eliminate a point of unjust discrimination against Catholics and will be welcomed not only by Catholics but far more widely."
The pressure group Republic, which campaigns for an elected head of state, dismissed plans to reform the rules of succession. Its campaign manager, Graham Smith, said: "The monarchy discriminates against every man, woman and child who isn't born into the Windsor family. To suggest this has anything to do with equality is utterly absurd." Buckingham Palace made no comment.
Mr Cameron also announced the creation of a Diamond Jubilee Trust, chaired by the former Prime Minister Sir John Major, to help those in need across the Commonwealth. Sir John said the Trust would "create an enduring tribute to one of our longest-serving monarchs, who is held in enormous affection by many millions of people around the Commonwealth".
Mr Cameron praised the Queen's "60 years of extraordinary public service" and said Britain would make a multimillion-pound donation to the Trust.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments