Legal blow for widow of poisoned spy Alexander Litvinenko who risks bankruptcy by continuing her battle for a public inquiry
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Marina Litvinenko’s fight for answers over the suspicious death of her husband, Alexander, has suffered another defeat after judges refused to protect her from facing crippling costs if she loses her legal battle for a public inquiry.
The widow of the former KGB spy could risk bankruptcy by continuing her battle, following the refusal by three High Court judges in London to make a “protected costs” order.
The cost of her judicial review application is likely to be around £40,000, which her barrister, Ben Emerson QC, said amounted to almost “everything she has in terms of assets she can access”.
Coroner Sir Robert Owen called for an inquiry into Mr Litvinenko’s 2006 death from polonium-210 poisoning after the former spy drank tea with two Russian men at a London hotel, but Theresa May, the Home Secretary, rejected this as it could harm relations with Russia.
This morning the judges will explain why they have refused to protect Mrs Litvinenko from incurring costs in her attempt to overturn Ms May’s decision.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments