Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour MPs say sale of air traffic control could put passengers at risk

Sarah Schaefer,Political Reporter
Tuesday 21 December 1999 00:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

John Prescott sought to avert an embarrassing backbench rebellion over controversial plans to privatise part of the National Air Traffic Services (Nats) last night, pledging that safety would continue to be an over-riding priority.

John Prescott sought to avert an embarrassing backbench rebellion over controversial plans to privatise part of the National Air Traffic Services (Nats) last night, pledging that safety would continue to be an over-riding priority.

However, in a highly unusual move, Labour backbenchers forced a debate on a rebel amendment, signed by 50 MPs, opposing the measure during the Transport Bill's second reading. The amendment warned that private profit could "jeopardise safety standards" in the future, and urged the Government to reconsider.

Gwyneth Dunwoody, chairwoman of the Transport Select Committee, said she was "totally opposed" to the plans for part privatisation, stressing there was a need for "careful" examination of the plans.

Mr Prescott said concerns that the profit motive would undermine safety had "not been proven". He told MPs: "I am happy to assure you that safety will continue to be the over-riding priority. This will not be a rushed 'sale without safeguards' of the kind we used to see from the Tory party."

The prospect of a bitter battle ahead with sizeable backbench revolts follow concerted efforts by the Deputy Prime Minister to draw a line under several months of bad publicity for his record on transport.

Mr Prescott insisted the legislation would help provide "a quality integrated transport system for the 21st century. It gives us the means to rebuild our transport industries, to reduce congestion and to improve the environment."

Mr Prescott said the Government was reversing "decades of decline" in public transport and had already "begun to turn the corner" after 30 months in office.

Through a 10-year investment programme to revitalise the transport system, the Government was "for the first time giving transport in this country the long term stability and certainty it needs", Mr Prescott said. He told critics of his policy on Nats that the Government would retain a 49 per cent stake. Change was needed because the existing public sector framework was "inadequate to deal with future growth".

John Redwood, the shadow Transport Secretary, told him: "What we now have ... is a non-Bill from a non-Minister. You have been airbrushed out of the script. It is an embarrassment. It is a Bill that will try to tax people off the road. It is a Bill which will clog up the railways with more regulation and no decisions. It is a Bill that will sell Nats on the cheap."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in