Labour MP calls for referendum on Brexit package before Article 50 is triggered in private members’ bill
Geraint Davies' private members' bill calls on the Government to allow the UK electorate to vote on the terms of the withdrawal
![The bill calls for 'detailed and specific information' on the proposed status of EU nationals living in the UK](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/01/17/16/eu-union-flag.jpg)
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
![Head shot of Andrew Feinberg](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/andrew-feinberg.png)
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
A referendum on the UK’s exit package from the European Union – with the option to remain a member of the bloc – should be held before the Government triggers Article 50, a Labour MP is demanding in a private members’ bill.
The bill from Geraint Davies, the Labour MP for Swansea West, comes as the Supreme Court prepares to hand down a crucial ruling on whether MPs should be given a vote on the triggering of Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty – the mechanism for leaving the EU.
But Mr Davies’ bill, which is not official Labour policy, calls on the Government to set out its negotiation package and allow the UK electorate to vote on this in a referendum before Theresa May serves EU leaders with the Article 50 notice.
“In June’s referendum, the British people did not vote for particular terms of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU,” said Mr Davies. “Triggering Article 50 hands back our EU membership, and gives the remaining 27 EU member states two years to decide the exit package which best suits their interests, to discourage others from leaving.
“The assurance that the UK would give people the final say on the exit package through a referendum would give the EU an incentive to negotiate before Article 50 is triggered. The vote would have an option to remain in the EU, if that is preferable to the agreed exit package. The Government should therefore delay triggering Article 50 and give people the final say.”
The Terms of Withdrawal from EU Referendum Bill says that the Government should also include “detailed and specific information” on the proposed status of EU nationals living in the UK and UK citizens living in other member states. Since the referendum in June, their status has been in a state of limbo.
The Bill proposes to ask the British public: “Do you support the Government’s proposed United Kingdom and Gibraltar exit package for negotiating withdrawal from the European Union or Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union?”
The options will include “support the Government’s propose exit package” and “remain a member of the European Union”.
In the landmark ruling on Tuesday the Supreme Court will deliver the verdict of 11 judges. It follows a ruling by the High Court in November stating that Parliament should have the final say on officially deciding that the UK wishes to leave the EU. Businesswoman Gina Miller, the lead claimant in the High Court case, has insisted the legal action was not aimed at stopping Brexit, but ensuring the supremacy of Parliament in the process.
But Mr Davies’ bill is unlikely to halt the Article 50 process, considering Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour leader, has stated on several occasions he will not block legislation allowing Ms May to trigger it. It is not year clear, however, whether MPs in the party will be compelled to vote for the measure as the leader’s team will not reveal if the vote will be whipped until the Government’s legislation appears in the Commons.
The Prime Minister has also repeatedly insisted the decision of the British public in June 2016 is irreversible and that there can be no second referendum and “no attempts to sort of stay in the EU by the back door”.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments