King Henry VIII crowned worst monarch in history while Queen Elizabeth I reigns supreme
Over 60 writers were asked to vote for their favourite and least favourite rulers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.King Henry VIII's grim legacy as an obsessive, petulant tyrant has seen him crowned as the worst monarch in history by the Historical Writers Association.
The study was conducted in partnership with the Harrogate History Festival, which will celebrate Queen Elizabeth II on her becoming Britain’s longest reigning monarch in October.
Over 60 writers were asked to vote for their favourite and least favourite monarchs, with 20 per cent criticising Henry VIII for his "self-indulgent" and "syphilitic" wife-murdering ways.
Prize-winning author Robert Wilton, who wrote The Spider of Sarajevo, labelled him a "gross man-child" who "barely made it out of infancy, let alone adolescence, and ruled with little more policy than petulant self-gratification".
Edward VIII was named the second worst, with 14 per cent of the vote, with John I and Charles I joint third, at 8 per cent.
Meanwhile 16th Century monarch Queen Elizabeth was voted as favourite, receiving 36 per cent of the votes.
"This would have been no mean feat for a king. For a woman at that period it was it was unprecented."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments