Key rail line to stay longer in public sector
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A key London to Scotland rail line taken over by the Government after transport giant National Express pulled out is to stay in the public sector for longer than planned, it was announced today.
The East Coast Main Line has been operated under the control of the Department for Transport since last November.
It had been hoped that it would pass back into private control by November next year.
But Transport Minister Theresa Villiers announced today that it was expected that there would be a change to this time scale due to the review of the whole rail franchising process now being undertaken.
Ms Villiers added that the on-going reletting process for two other franchises - Greater Anglia and Essex Thameside - was being scrapped.
It was expected that a new competition for Greater Anglia - now run by National Express as National Express East Anglia - would be advertised by the end of the year.
Competition for Essex Thameside - being run by National Express as c2c - is expected to start in autumn 2011.
Ms Villiers said the Government would shortly begin a consultation exercise on the future of rail franchising policy.
This would give the industry partners the chance to comment on the Government's approach to rail franchising and whether bidders for longer franchises would be able to offer investment in improvements to trains and services.
It would also allow the industry to set out its proposals for improving the efficiency and value for money of rail franchises for both taxpayers and farepayers.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments